A brief comment on the public's eroding trust in the American corporation.
In the wake of the recent case against Merck, some newspaper articles have criticized the American legal system's "irrational verdicts" and "insane" awards. Others said the verdict was "bad news for all consumers who hope that pharmaceutical companies will continue to develop new drugs", bemoaned the sick people who would now have to wait longer for drugs, and recommended lawsuit immunity for drug companies.
Merck hoped it would be safe from liability since they pulled Vioxx from the market ages ago, they followed FDA rules, and there didn't seem to be any proof citing Vioxx as the actual cause of Carol Ernst's husband's death.
Apparently, though, the jury was just really pissed off that Merck obviously knew their product was dangerous and they chose to ignore the dangers in order to raise their revenues. That is what was unacceptable - Merck's dishonesty, greed, and abuse of trust.
"The Texas jury didn't pull that $229 million punitive damages figure out of thin air. According to an internal memo written in 2001, that's the amount of extra profit the company estimated it could make if it could delay a Food and Drug Administration warning on the label.", explained an editorial in the St. Louis Post Dispatch.
I'm not an advocate for "lottery winning" lawsuits in any way -- and I think the award should go to a good cause and not into someone's wallet. But I believe the punishment fits the crime -- which was cheating the American people. For shame. If Merck gets forced into bankruptcy because of this case, it won't be that different from Enron, or any other company that cheated in order to win and then got caught. They have no-one to blame but themselves.